Nice.
Would it be helpful to compare .config.old to .config if you
don't provide any command line arguments?
scripts/diffconfig
would then do the job.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
> Does the linux-tiny approach of adding a kconfig variable for
> each 5kB of code actually make sense? I'm asking since an
> exploding amount of kconfig variables and their
> interdependencies have a not so small maintainance impact in
> the long term.
I don't want to answer for the general case,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Tim Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance of getting your minimal configs from Firmware Linux mainlined?
>
> Does anyone else think this would be valuable? If not in mainline, it
> would be nice to collect them somewhere, to compare what options different
>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Tim Bird wrote:
> +merge_style = 0
> +if "-m" in sys.argv:
> +merge_style = 1
> +sys.argv.remove("-m")
> +
> +if "-h" in sys.argv or len(sys.argv) < 3:
^^^
No checking for excess arguments?
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> No checking for excess arguments?
Holger Schurig wrote:
> Would it be helpful to compare .config.old to .config if you
> don't provide any command line arguments?
Both good ideas. These are implemented in the latest version.
Note that I check for and use KBUILD_OUTPUT
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> When I get my kconfig patchset polished you will be able to do:
>>>
>>> make K=my_mini_config allnoconfig
>> So you're renaming KCONFIG_ALLNOCONFIG then?
>
> Somehow yes. The K= notation I hope will see more use. Only very few
> people know the KCONFIG_ALL*CONFIG= trick.
I
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>> When I get my kconfig patchset polished you will be able to do:
> >>>
> >>> make K=my_mini_config allnoconfig
> >> So you're renaming KCONFIG_ALLNOCONFIG then?
> >
> > Somehow yes. The K= notation I hope will see
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>> When I get my kconfig patchset polished you will be able to do:
> >>>
> >>> make K=my_mini_config allnoconfig
> >> So you're renaming KCONFIG_ALLNOCONFIG then?
> >
> > Somehow yes. The K= notation I hope will see
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:36:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >>> When I get my kconfig patchset polished you will be able to do:
> > >>>
> > >>> make K=my_mini_config allnoconfig
> > >> So you're renaming KCONFI
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Randy's patch that documents KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is in Linus' tree since
> April 2006.
Well, dangit there it is!
The patch I googled had it going into Documentation/kbuild. It
somehow escaped my attention in the README. If I was
a little more skilled with my grep-ing I would
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:09:56 Tim Bird wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>> When I get my kconfig patchset polished you will be able to do:
> >>>
> >>> make K=my_mini_config allnoconfig
> >>
> >> So you're renaming KCONFIG_ALLNOCONFIG then?
> >
> > Somehow yes. The K= notation I hope will see mo
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 00:47:36 Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 02:54:32 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>> (Maybe I _am_ the only person who still cares about
> >>> building on a host without perl. If I wasn't, somebody else would have
> >>> acked the pa
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:46:55 Tim Bird wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Randy's patch that documents KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is in Linus' tree since
> > April 2006.
>
> Well, dangit there it is!
>
> The patch I googled had it going into Documentation/kbuild. It
> somehow escaped my attention in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
