On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:29:54 +0200, Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> Before digging any deeper I would like to know if someone as a better
> (more general) idea.
Could you stuff the output into an MTD device?
For that, see CONFIG_MTD_OOPS.
Thak's looks great.
Right now we have a watchdog without O
Marco Stornelli wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Jamie Lokier :
> > Marco wrote:
> >> > Second question: what happens if the system crashing _during_ a write
> >> > to a file. Does it mean that file will fail it's checksum when it's
> >> > read at the next boot?
> >> >
> >> > Maybe files aren't so important. W
OK - so after a bit more digging into things (and a poke by Mike) - I think
most of the stuff already exists.
Normal run time issues:
--
- MTD_OOPS - on 2007-06-28 this was added to Linus's tree:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/18/234
CONFIG_MTD_OOPS
tristate "
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> 2009/6/24 Jamie Lokier :
>>> Marco wrote:
>>> If it loses power when doing atomic rename (to replace config files,
>>> for example), it's likely that the whole /pramfs/configs/ directory
>>> will be corrupt, because the rename is writing to the direct
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:39:50AM -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> OK - so after a bit more digging into things (and a poke by Mike) - I think
> most of the stuff already exists.
>
> Normal run time issues:
> --
> - MTD_OOPS - on 2007-06-28 this was added to Linus's tree:
>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 13:42, David VomLehn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:39:50AM -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
>> OK - so after a bit more digging into things (and a poke by Mike) - I think
>> most of the stuff already exists.
>>
>> Normal run time issues:
>> --
>> - MTD
On Fri 26 Jun 2009 13:42, David VomLehn pondered:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:39:50AM -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > OK - so after a bit more digging into things (and a poke by Mike) - I
> think
> > most of the stuff already exists.
> >
> > Normal run time issues:
> > --
>
