Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread David Vrabel
Matt Fleming wrote: > > Is the 3.00 spec publicly available? There does not appear to be a simplified version of the 3.00 specification. David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:17:44 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thanks, Pierre. > > Until and unless someone else steps up I can act as maintainer of last > resort for MMC. As I'm presently doing for fbdev, hwmon, rtc, spi, > gpio, i2o and about 1000 other identifiable subsystems. > I'm not fall

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:08:08 +0100 Ian Molton wrote: > Pierre - do you have a bunch of MMC spec-type docs around? I've lost all > but the few sparse datasheets for TMIO that I had, so some docs covering > protocol / commands would be useful. Any references / downloads that you > know of? I us

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Pierre Ossman
I'll try to compose a list of outstanding discussions and patches so that people know what needs attention. I'll try to get that done in the next few days. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encr

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Ian Molton
Pierre Ossman wrote: MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual eye on things. I think an MMC list wouldnt be a bad idea now that we

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:40 +0100 Ian Molton wrote: > Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes > > lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always > > tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual ey

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:41:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:40 +0100 > Ian Molton wrote: > > > Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > > MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes > > > lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've alw