On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Results in microseconds:
>
> before after
> eMMC 194145 193641
> uSD 41432129
>
> However, that excludes powering up. For example the pbias setting
> on omap_hsmmc for MMC1 (uSD for us) has a 100ms delay.
>
> So
On 08/13/2009 02:30 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:31:25AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote :
>> On 08/11/2009 09:27 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>>> So I guess the only options left are either define a dummy raise()
>>> function, or
>>> get rid of the divisions like Alain Knaff di
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote :
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > This is the second part of patch. This part includes:
> > - changes to ach/arch/boot/Makefile to make it easier to add new
> >compression types
> >
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:31:25AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote :
> On 08/11/2009 09:27 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >
> > So I guess the only options left are either define a dummy raise()
> > function, or
> > get rid of the divisions like Alain Knaff did in his patch ?
> >
>
> Define a dummy ra
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:27:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> davem has set up linux-...@vger.kernel.org for us. It will be archived
> at marc.info. Thanks to both..
>
> I was thinking that we wouldn't need a separate list but then I
> realised I didn't have anywhere to send MMC bug report
Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Pierre Ossman wrote:
Con:
- The scanning code gets less clear as you increase the number of
possible paths through it.
- Different systems will have different init sequences, possibly
provoking bugs in