On 11/10/2010 09:15 PM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> 2010/11/9 Geert Uytterhoeven :
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 21:35, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>> You can still do all of those things without having a fixed endianess.
>>> You just have to have one extra step of telling the external tools what
>>> the endiane
On 11/10/2010 2:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:17, Tim Bird wrote:
On 11/09/2010 03:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 18:07, Tim Bird wrote:
It was noted at the summit that several CE companies and embedded
projects will be using (or are already using)
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:17, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 03:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 18:07, Tim Bird wrote:
>>> It was noted at the summit that several CE companies and embedded
>>> projects will be using (or are already using) 2.6.35 for upcoming
>>> products or
2010/11/9 Geert Uytterhoeven :
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 21:35, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> You can still do all of those things without having a fixed endianess.
>> You just have to have one extra step of telling the external tools what
>> the endianess is. IMHO, it is better to have the overhead of the
