On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Marco Stornelli
wrote:
> constraint). About the errors: pramfs does not maintain file data in the
> page caches for normal file I/O, so no writeback, the read/write
> operation are done with direct io and they are always sync. The data are
> write protected in hw w
Il 07/01/2011 19:42, Tony Luck ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Marco Stornelli
> wrote:
>> +accessed data that must survive system reboots and power cycles. An
>> +example usage might be system logs under /var/log, or a user address
>> +book in a cell phone or PDA.
>
> Some usage mo
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Marco Stornelli
wrote:
> +accessed data that must survive system reboots and power cycles. An
> +example usage might be system logs under /var/log, or a user address
> +book in a cell phone or PDA.
Some usage model questions:
How do you handle errors? I see that
On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
#define ASSERT_RTNL() do { \
if (unlikely(!rtnl_is_locked())) { \
printk(KERN_ERR "RTNL: assertion failed at %s (%d)\n", \
@@ -789,6 +790,9 @@ extern void __rtnl_unlock(void);
dump_
