Great! Thanks for the help.
On 10 June 2011 18:50, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:24:48 +0100 Andrew Murray wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Murray
>>
>> This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
>> extended format specifiers
>
On 9 June 2011 23:00, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:51 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:24:48 +0100 Andrew Murray wrote:
>> > + For printing-16 byte UUID/GUIDs addresses. The additional 'l', 'L',
>> For print
. When this occurs the
bootchart.pl script fails to give any useful output.
This patch sets the $firsttime variable to the largest value expected
by PRINTK_TIME
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
scripts/bootgraph.pl |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
Documentation/printk-formats.txt | 119 +-
1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
Documentation/printk-formats.txt | 119 +-
1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
Documentation/printk-formats.txt | 119 +-
1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Thanks - I've actually written the %pB documentation but just getting
in a mess with Git and my work flow - standby...
On 9 June 2011 18:47, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 2011-06-09 (목), 10:40 -0700, Joe Perches:
>> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:33 +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
>> > Hi,
Hi,
I've updated this patch based on your feedback. This covers all the recent
feedback.
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
Documentation/printk-formats.txt |
On 7 February 2011 19:33, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 18:12 +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On 7 February 2011 09:29, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > >> +
>
Thanks for the feedba
On 7 February 2011 09:29, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
>> +
>> + For printing kernel pointers which should be hidden from unprivileged
>> + users. The behaviour of %pK depends on the kptr_resrict sysctl - se
On 6 February 2011 16:14, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On 6 February 2011 10:16, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> In the mean time, we also got %pV and %pK. Can you please add them as well?
>> Thx!
>
> Ok how about this revised patch?
>
I've just noticed a zillion spelling
On 6 February 2011 10:16, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> In the mean time, we also got %pV and %pK. Can you please add them as well?
> Thx!
Ok how about this revised patch?
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format spec
Thanks for the feedback - I will truncate to 80 characters and
implement Joe's advice.
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
On 6 February 2011 00:37, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 00:15 +, Andrew Murray wrote:
>> From: Andrew Murray
>> This patch updates the inco
From: Andrew Murray
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray
---
diff --git a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
index 1b5a5dd..df14336 100644
--- a/Documentation/printk
always been there), etc.
And I've tried to use relative terms rather than absolute terms - so
the comparison is against an unoptimised system (e.g. perhaps a
customer has a pre-provided BSP and they have little knowledge of how
to optimise it and remove things via KConfig etc).
Thanks,
quot;
Do you largely agree or disagree?
Also do you believe that boot time isn't the highest priority when it
comes to improving the kernel?
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...
t; to get wider visibility of your proposal. I'm doing
> so in this response - I hope that's OK.
Thanks for the useful information - I'll read up on those slides.
Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
already been provided can bypass some of their probe
code and thus reducing boot time. Taking advantage of this framework
would be very trivial for drivers.
I wanted to see your views on the overall solution prior to
considering how it could be implemented.
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe
18 matches
Mail list logo
