Hello,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 14:11:49 David Woodhouse wrote:
>> I agree. And if we do want to pay attention to pure code size, there are
>> other approaches -- like --gc-sections and/or building with '--combine
>> -fwh
Hello all,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most packages don't cross compile at all. Debian has somewhere north of
> 30,000 packages. Every project that does large scale cross compiling
> (buildroot, gentoo embedded, timesys making fedora cross compile
Hello Robert,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> perusing the early boot code, i noticed that selecting the config
> variable BLK_DEV_INITRD gives you support for both initramfs, and an
> initrd image.
>
Yes, I thought initrd to disappear when no bloc
Robert,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> not sure if i asked this here once upon a time but, in the current
> kernel, you get to select support for *both* initrd and initramfs with
> a single selection (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD).
>
> ...
>
> in the con
Hello Jared,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jared Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm not sure it's a good idea to name this new filesystem AXFS.
>> People are almost certainly going to confuse it with XFS despite
>
People that care about their filesystem choice know their choices.
P
Hello all,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> Before 2.6.25 (specifically git bdc807871d58285737d50dc6163d0feb72cb0dc2 )
> building a Linux kernel never required perl to be installed on the build
> system. (Various development and debugging scripts were written in perl and
> py
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:03 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Dependencies very quickly become dependency hell. If A requires B,
>> then A also inherits all (future) requirements of B, etc. etc.
>>
>> In my daily software development work with Linux and GNU software in
>> general, 10% of it is
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Let's look at the rationale presented so far in this thread:
>
>1 - Being able to build the kernel natively on a constrained
>target is useful, regardless of whether it is being used for
>regression/stress testing
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Phillip Lougher
wrote:
>> - what are the limitations of squashfs (please add this to the
>> changelog of patch #1 or something). Does it support nfsd? (yes, it
>> does!) xatrs and acls? File size limits, entries-per-directory,
>> etc, etc?
>
> Xattrs a
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Thiago Galesi wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > I have written some code to program a FPGA in Linux, for two
>> > > different types of boards: one uses a serial interface (SPI) and
>> > > the second a parallel interface. I have been able to sucessfully
>> > > progra
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le Thursday 08 January 2009 23:47:58 Leon Woestenberg, vous avez écrit :
>> The programming back end should be generic enough so that it can use
>> other subsystems.
>>
> That's the idea behind
Hello Lasse,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lasse Collin wrote:
> (Please CC your replies to me, I'm not on the list.)
>
> An initial version of the .xz file format decoder for Linux is now
> available at . It supports both
> stateful and single-call decoding using the LZMA2 algorithm.
>
Is thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
