On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> How about the TFTP over USB? It's required feature for no ethernet devices
>
> In barebox (aka u-boot-v2) we have USB DFU support, in a very flexible
> way. Would that fit you
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:38, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Aras Vaichas wrote:
Support for 2nd stage booting from NAND with newer filesystems such as
UBIFS. i.e. simplified UBI/UB
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 02:29:12PM +1100, Aras Vaichas wrote:
> > In barebox (aka u-boot-v2) we have USB DFU support, in a very flexible
> > way. Would that fit your needs?
>
> That would probably be better than TFTP over ethernet. A USB DFU
> upgrade would only require the microcontroller to be fu
2009/12/4 Robert Schwebel :
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> How about the TFTP over USB? It's required feature for no ethernet devices
>
> In barebox (aka u-boot-v2) we have USB DFU support, in a very flexible
> way. Would that fit your needs?
That would probabl
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> How about the TFTP over USB? It's required feature for no ethernet devices
In barebox (aka u-boot-v2) we have USB DFU support, in a very flexible
way. Would that fit your needs?
> I wish some filesystem to share between u-boot and k
Hi David,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:59:50PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:46 -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> > It applies to anything in the "embedded Linux" ecosystem. This
> > would very much include open source boot loaders like U-Boot.
>
> And coreboot.
>
> The world needs
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:42 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Is it heretical to suggest a BSD licence for that too, to encourage
> > adoption into other bootloaders? Or at least LGPL or the "GPL with
> > linking exception" licence that libstdc++/eCos/JFFS2 have.
>
> Are you asking for a relicense o
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:17:30AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Aras Vaichas wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/3 Tim Bird
>>>
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
i know your e-mail intro states "embedded Linux" as does the wiki, but
i'm gonna take a stab anyways. does this apply to Linux
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:38, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Aras Vaichas wrote:
>>> Support for 2nd stage booting from NAND with newer filesystems such as
>>> UBIFS. i.e. simplified UBI/UBIFS read/write/format code in a small
>>> footprint.
>>>
>>> T
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aras Vaichas,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> Support for 2nd stage booting from NAND with newer filesystems such as
>> UBIFS. i.e. simplified UBI/UBIFS read/write/format code in a small
>> footprint.
>>
>> TFTP server in a boot loade
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Aras Vaichas wrote:
2009/12/3 Tim Bird
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i know your e-mail intro states "embedded Linux" as does the wiki, but
i'm gonna take a stab anyways. does this apply to Linux only and not
open source boot loaders (like U-Boot) ?
It applies to anything in t
Dear Aras Vaichas,
In message you
wrote:
>
> Support for 2nd stage booting from NAND with newer filesystems such as
> UBIFS. i.e. simplified UBI/UBIFS read/write/format code in a small
> footprint.
>
> TFTP server in a boot loader (U-boot or other). i.e. allows you to
> push a firmware upgrade
2009/12/3 Tim Bird
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i know your e-mail intro states "embedded Linux" as does the wiki, but
> > i'm gonna take a stab anyways. does this apply to Linux only and not
> > open source boot loaders (like U-Boot) ?
>
> It applies to anything in the "embedded Linux" ecosyste
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:46 -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
>> It applies to anything in the "embedded Linux" ecosystem. This
>> would very much include open source boot loaders like U-Boot.
>
> And coreboot.
>
> The world needs more coreboot.
If coreboot were on ARM, it would
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:46 -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> It applies to anything in the "embedded Linux" ecosystem. This
> would very much include open source boot loaders like U-Boot.
And coreboot.
The world needs more coreboot.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i know your e-mail intro states "embedded Linux" as does the wiki, but
> i'm gonna take a stab anyways. does this apply to Linux only and not
> open source boot loaders (like U-Boot) ?
It applies to anything in the "embedded Linux" ecosystem. This
would very much include
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 18:47, Tim Birdwrote:
> Hey embedded Linux developers...
>
> Are you itching to see some feature developed for embedded
> Linux? Would you like to suggest that CELF spend their
> money on some specific project? Would you like CELF to
> sponsor a project you are working on?
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> maybe i missed it, but there doesnt seem to be too much emphasis on
> working with the respective projects and getting merged. that seems
> like one of the most important aspects of doing any enhancement work
> as anything not merged means it'll quickly be left behind and l
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 18:47, Tim Bird wrote:
> The CELF Open Project Proposal is a process whereby members
> of the public submit to the CE Linux Forum ideas and
> proposals for projects that they think should be worked on
> to enhance embedded Linux. The plan is to solicit ideas for
> our 2010 c
Hey embedded Linux developers...
Are you itching to see some feature developed for embedded
Linux? Would you like to suggest that CELF spend their
money on some specific project? Would you like CELF to
sponsor a project you are working on?
Well, now is your chance! This is the official announc
20 matches
Mail list logo
