Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:22 +0200, Marco wrote:
>> From: Marco Stornelli
>>
>> Makefile and Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
>> ---
>>
>
> You should move this patch to 11 of 14, as I think that is the point
> when the filesystem can actually be enabled and fu
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> +
>> +config PRAMFS_NOWP
>> +bool "Disable PRAMFS write protection"
>> +depends on PRAMFS
>> +default n
>> +help
>> + Say Y here to disable the write protect feature of PRAMFS.
> n is default so "default n" is not needed.
> If you reverse the logic (and
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:22 +0200, Marco wrote:
> From: Marco Stornelli
>
> Makefile and Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
> ---
>
You should move this patch to 11 of 14, as I think that is the point
when the filesystem can actually be enabled and function. If this series
is only ap
> +
> +config PRAMFS_NOWP
> + bool "Disable PRAMFS write protection"
> + depends on PRAMFS
> + default n
> + help
> +Say Y here to disable the write protect feature of PRAMFS.
n is default so "default n" is not needed.
If you reverse the logic (and add a default y) then..
>
From: Marco Stornelli
Makefile and Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.30-orig/fs/Kconfig linux-2.6.30/fs/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.30-orig/fs/Kconfig2009-06-10 05:05:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.30/fs/Kconfig 2009-06-13 10:01:41.0 +0200
@@ -13,
