* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +void __trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
> +{
> + backtrace_mask = CPU_MASK_ALL;
> +}
i'd suggest cpu_online_map, i also added a busy-loop to wait for the
backtrace_mask to go back to 0. That way we get a consistent dump all
across. (as the NMI w
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + if (cpu_isset(cpu, backtrace_mask)) {
> + cpu_clear(cpu, backtrace_mask);
> + printk("NMI backtrace for cpu %d\n", cpu);
> + dump_stack();
> + }
yeah. There's just one issue: this will mix all the printks
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:15:47AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Hmm, except isn't the problem ALREADY that PPC is broken with 8-bit
> chars and htree? That's what started this problem in the first place.
> Running e2fsck allowed the kernel htree code to find the file, when
> it could not otherwi
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:54:30 +0200
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 29 September 2006 21:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > gad, there have been so many all-CPU-backtrace patches over the years.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ingo, do
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:43 +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've updated the ext4 kernel patches to 2.6.18-mm1. I've just done some
> reordering/simplifications and fixed some minor bugs:
>
> - merge all 64bit "metadata" patches together
>
> - fix false-positive format warnings in ba
On Friday 29 September 2006 21:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gad, there have been so many all-CPU-backtrace patches over the years.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ingo, do you think that's something which we shuld have in the
> > spinlock debugging code? A trac
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gad, there have been so many all-CPU-backtrace patches over the years.
>
>
>
> Ingo, do you think that's something which we shuld have in the
> spinlock debugging code? A trace to let us see which CPU is holding
> that lock, and where from? I gu
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:11:46 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:02 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> ...
> > > >+}
> > > >+/* Someone already cleaned up the buffer? */
> > > >+if (!buffer_jbd(bh)
> > > >+
On Sep 29, 2006 04:47 +, Dave Edwards wrote:
> I'm trying to tune a linux system to spin down its (ext2-formatted) disk when
> the system is idle. I've worked down to two problematic applications that
> periodically spin up the disk, even though the (tiny) file they're writing is
> (allegedly)
On Sep 28, 2006 21:08 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:22:51PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Package: e2fsprogs
> > Version: 1.39-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > you set the compiler option -fsigned-char, but on PowerPC the default is
> > unsigned char. This makes the ker
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:02 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
...
> > >+ }
> > >+ /* Someone already cleaned up the buffer? */
> > >+ if (!buffer_jbd(bh)
> > >+ || jh->b_transaction != commit_transaction
> > >+ || jh->b_jlist != BJ_SyncData) {
> > >
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:47:38AM +, Dave Edwards wrote:
> I'm trying to tune a linux system to spin down its (ext2-formatted) disk when
> the system is idle. I've worked down to two problematic applications that
> periodically spin up the disk, even though the (tiny) file they're writing is
>
On Friday 29 September 2006 06:47, Dave Edwards wrote:
> ...
> Is there any way to work back from block to inode to (hopefully) location
> in the directory structure this is happening? For some reason, I don't get
from man debugfs:
icheck block ...
Print a listing of the inodes which
13 matches
Mail list logo
