On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:45:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:59:52 -0600
> Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Why is ext3 slow??
> >
> > Allocation? I don't see anything indicating that Bill is o
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:45:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Bill, if you have time it'd be interesting to repeat the comparative
> benchmarking with:
>
> ext3, data=ordered:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=1000 of
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:59:52 -0600
Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Why is ext3 slow??
>
> Allocation? I don't see anything indicating that Bill is overwriting an
> existing file, so there is block allocation and journaling ov
> Dave Kleikamp (DK) writes:
DK> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Why is ext3 slow??
DK> Allocation? I don't see anything indicating that Bill is overwriting an
DK> existing file, so there is block allocation and journaling overhead. If
DK> that's the case, it
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Why is ext3 slow??
Allocation? I don't see anything indicating that Bill is overwriting an
existing file, so there is block allocation and journaling overhead. If
that's the case, it would be interesting to see how fast ext3 is when
overw
The patch titled
ext4_ext_split(): remove dead code
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ext4_ext_split-remove-dead-code.patch
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
-
can we get vmstat 1 output for the run?
thanks, Alex
> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Why is ext3 slow??
AM> Begin forwarded message:
AM> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:47:17 -0500
AM> From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AM> To: Arne Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AM> Cc: [EMAIL P
Why is ext3 slow??
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:47:17 -0500
From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arne Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICP, 3ware, Areca?
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Arne Schmitz wrote:
> Has anyone