On Mar 12, 2007 16:22 +0100, Valerie Clement wrote:
Mingming Cao wrote:
IBM has done some testing (dbench, fsstress, fsx, tiobench, iozone etc)
on 10TB ext3, I think RedHat and BULL have done similar test on 8TB
ext3 too.
Is there not a problem of backward-compatibility with old kernels?
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
I didn't quite beat you to it, but I did make a diff to bring
2.6.21-rc3-mm1 in tune with the take3 patch. It makes the code easier
to understand, but I'm not sure if it contains anything to fix the bug.
Code inspection hasn't gotten me any closer to figuring out what's
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:46:56AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
fallocate with the whence argument and flags is already quite complicated,
I'd rather have another call for placement decisions, that would
be called on an fd to do placement
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:29:05 -0500 Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:05 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
.
There were later patches posted to the list after this version, I think,
which
are not yet in
