Hi Andreas, Ted,
I've been looking at the uninitialized block group patches to see how
they overlap with the uninitialized inode tables that I was looking
into for FLEX_BG and I think I can achieve the same thing using those
patches. One of the things I wanted to achieve with uninitialized
inode
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>
> I am attaching below the PATCH 2/4 in .gz format. The uncompressed one
> got dropped by the list.
>
> -aneesh
hmm makes it hard to comment in-line though :) So basing this on the
patch currently in the git repo.
+/*
+ * default stripe size = 1MB
+ */
+#define MB_
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 21-08-07 11:43:12, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which
> > > has
> > > been overwritten by garbage...
> > >
On Tue 21-08-07 11:43:12, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which has
> > been overwritten by garbage...
> >
> > > > Thanks for details. I'm still not convinced. What they essentia
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which has
> been overwritten by garbage...
>
> > > Thanks for details. I'm still not convinced. What they essentially
> > > write is that slab cache revoke_record_cache
