From: Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FLEX_BG Kernel support v2.
This feature relaxes check restrictions on where each block groups meta data is
located within the storage media. This allows for the allocation of bitmaps or
inode tables outside the block group boundaries in cases where bad
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:21:39 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007 07:27 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:04:43 -0600
> > "Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/10/07, Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > @@ -1254,7 +
On Sep 11, 2007 07:27 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:04:43 -0600
> "Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/10/07, Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > @@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors (struct
> > > super_block * sb)
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 13:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
>
> http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
>
>
>
> The series file is
>
> # This series applies on GIT commit b07d68b5ca4d55a16fab223d63d5fb36f89ff42f
> ext4-j
Annoyingly this seems to be intermittent, and I have not managed to get
a machine into this state again yet. Will keep trying.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> I have a couple of failed test runs against 2.6.23-rc6 where the
> job timed out while running dbench over ext3. Both on powerpc,
> though both significantly different hardware setups. A failed
> run like this implies that the machine was still res
> I have a couple of failed test runs against 2.6.23-rc6 where the
> job timed out while running dbench over ext3. Both on powerpc,
> though both significantly different hardware setups. A failed
> run like this implies that the machine was still responsive to
> other processes but the dbench was
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
Test status:
Minor testing with KVM. I also didn't do a PPC build.
running fsstress on ppc64 give me
EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 3225
I have a couple of failed test runs against 2.6.23-rc6 where the
job timed out while running dbench over ext3. Both on powerpc,
though both significantly different hardware setups. A failed
run like this implies that the machine was still responsive to
other processes but the dbench was making no
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:04:43 -0600
"Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors (struct super_block
> > * sb)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_groups_count; i++)
> > {
I have updated the mballoc patches. The same can be found at
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
The series file is
# This series applies on GIT commit b07d68b5ca4d55a16fab223d63d5fb36f89ff42f
ext4-journal_chksum-2.6.20.patch
ext4-journal-chksum-review-fix.patch
ext4_uninit_b
11 matches
Mail list logo