I checked the logs today for the fsstress run i found this in my dmesg log. The
same stack trace is repeated for many times
uh! busy PA
Call Trace:
[c000efa72fc0] [c000fe30] .show_stack+0x6c/0x1a0 (unreliable)
[c000efa73060] [c01954a0]
.ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocati
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 18:32 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2007 22:18 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Attaching below patch that fix the sparse warning for ext4.
>
> It would be good to also fix the "raw" access of split 48-bit and 64-bit
> fields as I previously sent to the list.
On Sep 12, 2007 22:18 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Attaching below patch that fix the sparse warning for ext4.
It would be good to also fix the "raw" access of split 48-bit and 64-bit
fields as I previously sent to the list. A new typedef for these fields
(on disk) would ensure that they are
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:29 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Valerie,
>
>
> Valerie Clement wrote:
> > Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>
> >> running fsstress on ppc64 give me
> >> EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 32254 in gd
> >> EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allo
Rebased the patches to 2.6.23-rc5, I reordered the series file to move
cleanups/fixes to the beginning of the series file. Added a patch to
cleanup slab useage in jbd/jbd2, and fixed some checkpatch.pl warnings.
Added large block patch and Jose's FLEX_BG patch.
Changes since 2.6.23-rc4
# cleanup
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ted is dir_index maintainer ;)
>
> That's a nice-looking bug report, btw. Thanks.
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:01:07 +0900
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ext3 dir_index ca
Valerie,
Valerie Clement wrote:
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
running fsstress on ppc64 give me
EXT4-fs: group 9: 16384 blocks in bitmap, 32254 in gd
EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used: Allocating
block in system zone - block = 294915
EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_ext_
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> FS
>
> Subject : hanging ext3 dbench tests
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/176
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
>
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc6.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
List of Aces
NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
Adrian Bunk10
Linus Torvalds
Attaching below patch that fix the sparse warning for ext4.
NOTE: yet to test the changes.
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 390b36d..a3ffa15 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2567,7 +2567,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:27:54 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007 19:07 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> > @@ -1248,13 +1248,17 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors (struct
> > super_block * sb)
> > ext4_fsblk_t inode_table;
> > struct ext4_group_desc * gdp = N
On Sep 11, 2007 19:07 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> @@ -1248,13 +1248,17 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors (struct super_block
> * sb)
> ext4_fsblk_t inode_table;
> struct ext4_group_desc * gdp = NULL;
> int desc_block = 0;
> + int flexbg_bg = 0;
> int i;
>
> +
12 matches
Mail list logo
