On Nov 20, 2007 12:22 -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 12:14 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> > Mingming Cao wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 22:12 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> > The hole is (s_dir_ireserve_nr - 1), not N * s_dir_ireserve_nr. Because
> > directory inode will also use a inode
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 12:14 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback :-)
>
> Mingming Cao wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 22:12 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> >> Basic idea of my dir inode reservation patch can be found here,
> >> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2007/11/05/3
> >>
> >> 1, Wha
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
Please do report any problems you find, though. Ted has said that the
sourceforge bugtracker is the right place to do this for now.
BTW, when reporting a bugs against the git tree, please include the
branch and the git ID (i.e., that which is reported b
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:56:41AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> >>> Note that the userspace code still needs a lot of work.
> >>> It's for this reason that I haven't been recommending people use it for
> >>>
On Wed 21-11-07 00:40:17, Coly Li wrote:
> Jan Kara wrote:
> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> >> index 17b5df1..f838a72 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> >> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> >> * Stephen Tweedie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), 1993
> >> * Big-endian
Hi,
Here you can find some performance comparison in terms of CPU
utilization and transactions per second (using FFSB) on ext4 filesystem
with and without i_version option.
http://bullopensource.org/ext4/20071116/ffsb-write.html
regards,
Jean noel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
Jan,
Thanks for taking time to review the patch :-)
Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi Coly,
>
> finally I've found some time to have a look at a new version of your
> patch.
>
>> 5, Performance number
>> On a Core-Duo, 2MB DDM memory, 7200 RPM SATA PC, I built a 50GB ext4
>> partition, and tried to crea
Hi Coly,
finally I've found some time to have a look at a new version of your
patch.
> 5, Performance number
> On a Core-Duo, 2MB DDM memory, 7200 RPM SATA PC, I built a 50GB ext4
> partition, and tried to create 5 directories, and create 15 (1KB)
> files in each directory alternatively.
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
>>> Note that the userspace code still needs a lot of work.
>>> It's for this reason that I haven't been recommending people use it for
>>> production systems just yet.
>> Understood. But the more ppl testing you
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > Note that the userspace code still needs a lot of work.
> > It's for this reason that I haven't been recommending people use it for
> > production systems just yet.
>
> Understood. But the more ppl testing your stuff the better,
On Tue, November 20, 2007 04:11, Theodore Tso wrote:
> There is a git tree. It's at:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git;a=summary
>
> The bleeding edge branch is the 'pu' (proposed updates), which you
> need if you want the full ext4 features.
Ah, I've seen the git tree, but missed
11 matches
Mail list logo
