On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:15:28 -0700
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 10:08 -0600, Jose R. Santos wrote:
I'd think being able to avoid the divide for every inode allocation is
more
important than 8 bits in the superblock.
We already avoid the divide since
I have a hand-crafted bad filesystem image which has a corrupted directory
entry:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls mnt/Picture
LINKS_20 OBEN_20 VORNE_20 VORN_LINKS_20 VORN_RECHTS_20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls mnt/Picture/VORN_LINKS_20
ls: cannot access mnt/Picture/VORN_LINKS_20: No such file or
On Dec 13, 2007 09:51 -0600, Jose R. Santos wrote:
Now, storing the bits only guaranties that the flexbg size is always a
power-of-two and does not guarantee that the super block flexbg size
represents the actual meta-data grouping on disk. For this we need to
verify that the bitmap offsets
