> I'd tried to advocate SIGDANGER some years ago as well, but none of
> the kernel maintainers were interested. It definitely makes sense
> to have some sort of mechanism like this. At the time I first brought
> it up it was in conjunction with Netscape using too much cache on some
> system, but
> Stable kernels are mainly meant for usage, not for trying stuff.
You appear to be reinventing history in your attempt to justify removing
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
> And although I see a point in perhaps shipping some not-yet-perfect
> device drivers for otherwise unsupported hardware or some
> not
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:41:57 -0700
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 02, 2008 03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels,
> > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel
> > offered it - a
