On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:51:30 -0600
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of the retry code has been looked at.
This is what I'm mostly interested in ... predictable, well behaving and tested
error handling & recovery. Is ext4 going to be any better here than ext3?
Hello,
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/adsl/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf
I think I got this link from OLS papers or from fs workshop ... and I really
like what it says.
How many of ixt3 features are going to be implemented in ext4?
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org
-
To unsubscribe from this
