On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:45:02PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > handle_t's are removed and such before processing the revoke lists, but
> > > right
> > > before we process the revoke lists we set the journals running
> > > transaction to
> > > NULL, which means we can continue on our merry way
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 21-08-07 11:43:12, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which
> > > has
> > > been overwritten by garbage...
> > >
On Tue 21-08-07 11:43:12, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which has
> > been overwritten by garbage...
> >
> > > > Thanks for details. I'm still not convinced. What they essentia
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, thanks. So record probably points to an already freed memory which has
> been overwritten by garbage...
>
> > > Thanks for details. I'm still not convinced. What they essentially
> > > write is that slab cache revoke_record_cache
On Thu 16-08-07 12:37:45, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:08:35PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> > > > > journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when
> > > > > traversing the
> > > > > journa
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:08:35PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > > It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> > > > journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing
> > > > the
> > > > journal's revoked record list. This patch has
Hello,
> > > It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> > > journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing
> > > the
> > > journal's revoked record list. This patch has been tested and we haven't
> > > seen
> > > the issue yet, its a rath
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> > journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing the
> > journal's revoked record list. This patch has been tested and we ha
Hello,
> It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing the
> journal's revoked record list. This patch has been tested and we haven't seen
> the issue yet, its a rather straightforward and correct
Hello,
It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing the
journal's revoked record list. This patch has been tested and we haven't seen
the issue yet, its a rather straightforward and correct (at least
10 matches
Mail list logo
