On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
b) what happens when an old ext2 driver tries to read and/or write this
directory entry? Do we need a compat flag for it?
Old ext2 only supports up to 4k
include/linux/ext2_fs.h:
#define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE 1024
#define
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
b) what happens when an old ext2 driver tries to read and/or write this
directory entry? Do we need a compat flag for it?
Old ext2 only supports up to 4k
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and
convert
value
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static inline __le16 ext2_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len)
+{
+ if (len == (1 16))
+ return cpu_to_le16(EXT2_MAX_REC_LEN);
+ else if (len (1 16))
+ BUG();
+ return cpu_to_le16(len);
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:18:49 +0200 Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and convert
value when read from / written to disk.
btw, this changes ext2's
On Thu 04-10-07 16:11:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
into 16 bits we
On Thu 04-10-07 13:12:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
From: Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
On Thu 04-10-07 13:12:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
From: Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
From: Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 04, 2007 13:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and
ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
From: Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0x instead and convert
value when read from / written to disk.
Signed-off-by:
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ext4 in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
