On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:51:10PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > This is what I've checked in. See the comment about why we can't
> > ignore a difference for the extended attribute feature.
>
> Ok. Unfortunately, that one really hurts on fedora, or any distro which
> write
Theodore Tso wrote:
> This is what I've checked in. See the comment about why we can't
> ignore a difference for the extended attribute feature.
Ok. Unfortunately, that one really hurts on fedora, or any distro which
writes xattrs during install.
The installer mkfs's, mounts, installs with seli
This is what I've checked in. See the comment about why we can't
ignore a difference for the extended attribute feature.
- Ted
commit a8cde73acbf6e0f9c0a3601e4f5fac2b01a27bd2
Author: Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Jan 26 23:17:50 2008
(updated for thinko: when proper flag *is* set on both primary & backup)
Recent e2fsprogs (1.40.3 and higher) fsck compares primary superblock to
backups, and if things differ, it forces a full check. However, the
kernel has a penchant for updating flags the first time a feature is
used - attrib
