On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:52:49PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I think "rm -r" does a LOT of this kind of operation, like:
>
> stat(.); stat(foo); chdir(foo); stat(.); unlink(*); chdir(..); stat(.)
>
> I think "find" does the same to avoid security problems with malicious
> path manipulation.
On May 01, 2007 11:28 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:42AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Except one other issue with online shrinking is that we need to move
> > inodes on occasion and this poses a bunch of other problems over just
> > remapping the data blocks.
>
>
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:42AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Except one other issue with online shrinking is that we need to move
> inodes on occasion and this poses a bunch of other problems over just
> remapping the data blocks.
Well, I did say "necessary", and not "sufficient". But yes, m
On Apr 30, 2007 08:09 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > I'd prefer that such functionality be integrated with Takashi's online
> > defrag tool, since it needs virtually the same functionality. For that
> > matter, this is also very si
On Mon 30-04-07 08:09:30, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > I'd prefer that such functionality be integrated with Takashi's online
> > defrag tool, since it needs virtually the same functionality. For that
> > matter, this is also very simila
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I'd prefer that such functionality be integrated with Takashi's online
> defrag tool, since it needs virtually the same functionality. For that
> matter, this is also very similar to the block-mapped -> extents tool
> from Aneesh.
