On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 10:16 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Just a quick note before I forget. I thought there was a call in ext4
to set JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT at mount time if the filesystem has
more than 2^32 blocks?
Question about the online resize case. If the fs is increased to more
On Apr 19, 2007 12:15 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 10:16 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Just a quick note before I forget. I thought there was a call in ext4
to set JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT at mount time if the filesystem has
more than 2^32 blocks?
Question about
On Apr 19, 2007 17:41 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Any concerns about turn on META_BG by default for all new ext4 fs?
Initially I thought we only need META_BG for support 256TB, so there is
no rush to turn it on for all the new fs. But it appears there are
multiple benefits to enable META_BG by
Just a quick note before I forget. I thought there was a call in ext4
to set JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT at mount time if the filesystem has
more than 2^32 blocks? I don't see that anywhere in the 2.6.20 ext4.
Is that in the upstream git repo?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal
