Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] f2fs: some fix and cleanup about flush_merge

2014-04-13 Thread Gu Zheng
On 04/14/2014 09:44 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > Hi Gu, > > I just started to review the patches and merge them individually though. > Since I've been internally doing in my local tree, so that should be no > problem. I'll roll back to the latest point. OK, and please pay some attention to the flush

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] f2fs: some fix and cleanup about flush_merge

2014-04-13 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Gu, I just started to review the patches and merge them individually though. Since I've been internally doing in my local tree, so that should be no problem. I'll roll back to the latest point. Anyway, thank you for your work. :) 2014-04-14 (월), 09:18 +0800, Gu Zheng: > Hi All, > There seems t

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: put the bio when issue_flush completed

2014-04-13 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Gu, Merged. thank you. :) 2014-04-11 (금), 17:49 +0800, Gu Zheng: > Put the bio when the flush cmd issued, it also can fix the following > kmemleak: > unreferenced object 0x8800270c73c0 (size 200): > comm "f2fs_flush-7:0", pid 27161, jiffies 4312127988 (age 988.503s) > hex dump (first 32

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] f2fs: some fix and cleanup about flush_merge

2014-04-13 Thread Gu Zheng
Hi All, There seems to be a mistake in "[PATCH 2/7]f2fs: remove the unuseful "issue_tail" list", and the whole patchset needs to be reworked. So please ignore this one. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Gu On 04/11/2014 05:49 PM, Gu Zheng wrote: > Gu Zheng (7): > f2fs: put the bio when issue_flush

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: remove the unuseful "issue_tail" list

2014-04-13 Thread Gu Zheng
Hi All, There seems to be a mistake in this patch, please ignore it. I'll send a reworked one later. Regards, Gu On 04/11/2014 05:49 PM, Gu Zheng wrote: > With the issue_list and dispatch_list, we can handle flush_merge > already, so remove the useless "issue_tail" list. > > Signed-off-by: Gu Z