Hi Jaegeuk,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:47:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch enforces in-place-updates only when fdatasync is requested.
> If we adopt this in-place-updates for the fdatasync, we can skip to write the
> recovery information.
But, as you know, random write occurs when chan
Hi, Chao.
It's my mistake.
Thanks :-)
Signed-off-by: Dongho Sim
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 8a6e57d..7af4a8d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -973,14 +973,12 @@ void allocate_dat
Hi Dongho,
> - Original Message -
>
> From： "Dongho Sim"
> Sent： Monday, July 28, 2014 1:51 PM
> To： "Chao Yu"
> Cc： jaeg...@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject： Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Remove an unnecessary line in
> allocate_data_block.
>
> Yes, there was ano
