Hi Jaegeuk,
Thanks for explanation.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:42:19AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:21:31PM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > f2fs_dirty_inode just set fi->flag as FI_DIRTY_INODE not to
> > call update_inode_page. Instead, we do it when f2fs_wri
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:21:31PM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> f2fs_dirty_inode just set fi->flag as FI_DIRTY_INODE not to
> call update_inode_page. Instead, we do it when f2fs_write_indoe is called.
> Do you have any reason to do like this?
Actually, I'd like to use inode caches instead
Hi Yu,
Thanks for your review.
Changes from V3
o check if entry exists to avoid many kmem_cache_{alloc, free}
Changes from V2
o rename iradix to iroot
o declare gc_inode_list in gc.h
Changes from V1
o introduce gc_inode_list containing ilist and iradix
o use local variable
o call r
Hi Changman,
> -Original Message-
> From: Changman Lee [mailto:cm224@samsung.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:38 AM
> To: Jaegeuk Kim
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2] f2fs: more fast lookup for gc_
