Change log from v2:
- consider omitting current dirty segments
>From 181cb245f6a406e89c00976f65a5727956a72942 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: skip checkpoint if there is no dirty and prefree
segments
We should avoid needle
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:58:06PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim
wrote:
> IMO, it's similar to flash drives too. Indeed, I believe host-managed
> SMR/flash
> drives are likely to show much better performance than drive-managed ones.
If I had one, its performance would be abysmal, as filesystems (and
indee
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:18:37AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > 1041 err = read_node_page(apage, READA);
> > 1042 f2fs_put_page(apage, err ? 1 : 0);
> >
> > In the old code we took errors into consideration but now we treat them
> > as LOCKED_PAGE. Is that intentional? A l
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:40:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Jaegeuk Kim,
>
> The patch 86531d6b84bc: "f2fs: callers take care of the page from bio
> error" from Jul 15, 2015, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
>
> fs/f2fs/node.c:1042 ra_node_page()
>
Chang log from v1:
- remove inappropriate remained flag ops suggested by Chao
Thanks,
>From 8ab2c8bacedb74d35dfe481d43a8fb1291650c39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:45:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: do not write any node pages related to orphan inodes
We s
Hello Jaegeuk Kim,
The patch 86531d6b84bc: "f2fs: callers take care of the page from bio
error" from Jul 15, 2015, leads to the following static checker
warning:
fs/f2fs/node.c:1042 ra_node_page()
warn: 'err' can be either negative or positive
fs/f2fs/node.c
1025 void ra_node_
In f2fs_delete_entry, if last dirent is remove from the dentry page,
we will try to punch that page since it has no valid date in it.
But truncate_hole which is used for punching could fail because of
no memory or IO error, if that happened, we'd better skip clearing
this valid dentry page.
Signe
I volunteer to be a dedicated reviewer of f2fs, add my email address in
maintainship entry of f2fs.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cbf6113..bb5e3a9 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4406,6 +4
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 6:03 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: do n
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:34 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: do not assing a n
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:09 PM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] f2fs: skip checkpoint if there
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:23 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: increase the nu
12 matches
Mail list logo