Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers

2016-12-14 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 11:14 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good > start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as > well in the initial version. Did Andrew Morton ever comment on this? I believe he was the primar

Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers

2016-12-14 Thread Michal Hocko
On Tue 13-12-16 14:07:33, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 11:14 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good > > start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as > > well in the initial version. > > Did Andrew

Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers

2016-12-14 Thread Michal Hocko
Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as well in the initial version. On Thu 08-12-16 11:33:00, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Using kmalloc with the vmalloc fallback for larger allo

Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers

2016-12-14 Thread Michal Hocko
On Tue 13-12-16 13:55:46, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good > > start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as > > well in the initial version. > > I'm in

Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.10

2016-12-14 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:38:32PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > BTW, I just downloaded mainline, and tried to build a debian package but > > failed due to missing Documentation/Changes. > > > > I've found out that it was renamed by com

Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.10

2016-12-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > BTW, I just downloaded mainline, and tried to build a debian package but > failed due to missing Documentation/Changes. > > I've found out that it was renamed by commit 186128f753 > ("docs-rst: add documents to development-process") > > And

Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.10

2016-12-14 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 12/14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 12/14, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > > > Could you please consider this pull request? > > > > Pulled. Mind double-checking my resolution wrt commit 70fd76140a6c > > ("block,fs: use REQ_* flags directly")? >

Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.10

2016-12-14 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 12/14, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > Could you please consider this pull request? > > Pulled. Mind double-checking my resolution wrt commit 70fd76140a6c > ("block,fs: use REQ_* flags directly")? Thank you, and the resolution looks good to

Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.10

2016-12-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Could you please consider this pull request? Pulled. Mind double-checking my resolution wrt commit 70fd76140a6c ("block,fs: use REQ_* flags directly")? Linus