This patch add a function to modify discard command if one segment
reuse before discard. Split this segment from multi-segments discard
range, and discard the left bigger range.
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-
On 2017/2/26 3:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/25, heyunlei wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am really confused by the condition below use sec_freed, is it always
>> equal to zero?
>
> Seems it is always zero. Let's fix it together.
>
> Pengyang,
>
> I merged your patches and finally got this.
> How do
On 2017/2/26 20:47, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> F2FS has define MAX_FREE_NIDS for maximum of cached free nids target.
>
> #define MAX_FREE_NIDS (NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * FREE_NID_PAGES)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee
All clean patches looks good to me.
To Jaegeuk, please add:
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
On 2017/2/26 3:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/25, guoweichao wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> I regard no enough free sections as a precondition when talking about
>> BG_GC -> FG_GC. I mean that for both case a) and b) I mentioned has no enough
>> free sections implicitly.
>>
>> On 2017/2/25 2:49, Jaeg
On 2017/2/27 11:08, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> On 2/27/2017 10:21, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/2/25 19:23, Kinglong Mee wrote:
>>> If hsize is less than or equal to inlien_size, and i_xattr_nid is valid,
>>> the new_nid is not allocated (no alloc_nid is called).
>>>
>>>if (hsize > inline_size &&
On 2017/2/26 3:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> I added below diff code into this patch in order to fix incorrectly nid
>> status
>> updating to reduce large latency of generic/251 in fstest, could you help to
>> review code below?
>
> Understand the problem,
On 2/27/2017 10:21, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/2/25 19:23, Kinglong Mee wrote:
>> If hsize is less than or equal to inlien_size, and i_xattr_nid is valid,
>> the new_nid is not allocated (no alloc_nid is called).
>>
>>if (hsize > inline_size && !F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid)
>>
On 2017/2/26 2:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/2/24 6:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 02/23, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/2/14 10:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> ...
>>>
> +static int scan_nat_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sb
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/2/27 9:59, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> We use has_not_enough_free_secs to check if there are enough free segments,
>
> (free_sections(sbi) + freed) <=
> (node_secs + 2 * dent_secs + imeta_secs +
> reserved_sections(sbi) + needed);
Now node S
On 2017/2/25 19:23, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> If hsize is less than or equal to inlien_size, and i_xattr_nid is valid,
> the new_nid is not allocated (no alloc_nid is called).
>
>if (hsize > inline_size && !F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid)
> if (!alloc_nid(sbi, &new_nid))
>
On 2017/2/23 12:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch adds MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS() to avoid issuing too much large single
> discard command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
This patch set looks good to me, please add reviewed-by into all patches. :)
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
---
On 2017/2/26 3:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/25, heyunlei wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am really confused by the condition below use sec_freed, is it always
>> equal to zero?
>
> Seems it is always zero. Let's fix it together.
>
> Pengyang,
>
> I merged your patches and finally got this.
> How do yo
Mkfs.f2fs doesn't check the overwrite of exist filesystem.
Avoid formatting an exist filesystem by mistake, a notice is important.
The code is modified from xfsprogs.
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee
---
configure.ac| 20 +--
mkfs/Makefile.am| 4 +--
mkfs/f2fs_format_main
F2FS has define MAX_FREE_NIDS for maximum of cached free nids target.
#define MAX_FREE_NIDS (NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * FREE_NID_PAGES)
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 6
14 matches
Mail list logo
