On 04/07/2017 05:57 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> CURRENT_TIME macro is not y2038 safe on 32 bit systems.
>
> The patch replaces all the uses of CURRENT_TIME by
> current_time().
>
> This is also in preparation for the patch that transitions
> vfs timestamps to use 64 bit time and hence make them
>
The index of segment which the next nat block is in has only one different
bit than the current one, so to get the next nat address, we can simply
alter that one bit.
Signed-off-by: Fan Li
---
fs/f2fs/node.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:36 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Deepa Dinamani
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:36 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Jun
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Deepa Dinamani
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:36 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Ju
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Deepa Dinamani
wrote:
> On Thu,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 20
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> What I meant is another related problem in ceph_mkdir() where the
>> i_ctime field of the parent inode is different between the persist
On 2017/6/2 15:45, Fan Li wrote:
> The index of segment which the next nat block is in has only one different
> bit than the current one, so to get the next nat address, we can simply
> alter that one bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Li
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
Thanks,
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.h | 5 +---
10 matches
Mail list logo