This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas. Referring
to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with
patches; user documentation is available elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski
---
Sending this as one piece; if you guys would instead prefer this ch
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:38:25AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas. Referring
> to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with
> patches; user documentation is available elsewhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > - I don't understand the error for xa_head here:
> >
> > struct xarray {
> > spinlock_t xa_lock;
> > gfp_t xa_flags;
> > void __rcu *xa_head;
> > };
> >
> >Do people really think that:
> >
> > struct xar
Hi Chao,
Thanks for your reply.
> On 2017/12/9 14:29, hsiangkao--- via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk and Chao,
>> I have a minor question about the following code snippet in
>> find_next_free_block recently
>> if (se->valid_blocks == 0 && !(segno % sbi->segs_per_sec)) {
On 2017/12/9 14:29, hsiangkao--- via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk and Chao,
> I have a minor question about the following code snippet in
> find_next_free_block recently
> if (se->valid_blocks == 0 && !(segno % sbi->segs_per_sec)) {
> struct seg_entr
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/12/9 3:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Change log from v1:
> - fix bug in error handling of ioctl
>
>>From b905e03d8aad7d25ecaf9bde05411a68d3d2460e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:25:39 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl to disable
