On 2018-10-12 22:18, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00:20PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>
>> So finally, we will initialize leftmost's value here, anyway, I think there
>> is
Sorry, I mean 'there is no such place...'
>> such place we use an uninitialized variable.
>>
>> BTW, do we
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00:20PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>
> So finally, we will initialize leftmost's value here, anyway, I think there is
> such place we use an uninitialized variable.
>
> BTW, do we have any chance to detect such case in smatch?
>
Thanks for taking a look at this! I think t
Hi Dan,
Firstly, thanks for the report. :)
On 2018-10-11 20:23, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Chao Yu,
>
> The patch df634f444ee9: "f2fs: use rb_*_cached friends" from Oct 4,
> 2018, leads to the following static checker warning:
>
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c:606 f2fs_update_extent_tree_range
During recover, we will try to create new dentries for inodes with
dentry_mark. But if the parent is missing (e.g. killed by fsck),
recover will break. But those recovered dirty pages are not cleanup.
This will hit f2fs_bug_on:
[ 53.519566] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[ 53.53
