On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:20:37PM +0900, boojin.kim wrote:
>
> If yes, I think the following API needs to be added to skcipher:
> - _set(): BIO submitter (dm-crypt, f2fs, ext4) sets cipher to BIO.
> - _mergeable(): Block layer checks if two BIOs have the same cipher.
> - _get(): Storage driver
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 17:19:41PM +0900, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:57:41PM +0900, boojin.kim wrote:
> >
> > Can you tell me which patch you mentioned? Is this?
> > https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-crypto/list/?series=22762
> >
>
> Yes this is the one.
>
> Cheers,
I
On 2019/7/12 16:55, Chao Yu wrote:
> Wrap merge condition into function for readability, no logic change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
> ---
> v2: remove bio validation check in page_is_mergeable().
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 40 +---
> 1 file changed, 33
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:10 AM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 8/21/19 12:42 AM, boojin.kim wrote:
> > This patch supports crypto information to be maintained via BIO
> > and passed to the storage driver.
> >
> > To do this, 'bi_aux_private', 'REQ_CYPTE' and 'bi_dun' are added
> > to the block layer.
>
On 2019/8/23 5:49, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Thanks, the test passes for me with this patch applied.
>
> Tested-by: Eric Biggers
> .
Thanks for the test.
Thanks,
On 2019/8/23 3:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/21, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Ping,
>>
>> On 2019/8/12 20:01, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>>
>>> In por_fsstress testcase, fsck reports below inconsistent status, I found
>>> one
>>> path can cause this case.
>>>
>>> [FIX] (fsck_chk_inode_blk:1002) -->
On 2019/8/23 1:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 08/20, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2019/8/20 4:20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> build_sit_info() allocate all bitmaps for each segment one by one,
> it's quite low efficiency, this pach changes to
On Wed, 22 Aug 2019 at 17:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> Your patch looks corrupted - wrapped by mailer. The easiest way
> usually is to use git format-patch and git send-email - then you do
> not have to worry about formatting etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
I'm using outlook instead of
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:17:56PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> As Eric reported:
>
> On xfstest generic/204 on f2fs, I'm getting a kernel BUG.
>
> allocate_segment_by_default+0x9d/0x100 [f2fs]
> f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x3c0/0x5c0 [f2fs]
> do_write_page+0x62/0x110 [f2fs]
>
On 08/21, Chao Yu wrote:
> Ping,
>
> On 2019/8/12 20:01, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> >
> > In por_fsstress testcase, fsck reports below inconsistent status, I found
> > one
> > path can cause this case.
> >
> > [FIX] (fsck_chk_inode_blk:1002) --> Symlink: recover 0x1425 with
> >
On 08/20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/20, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2019/8/20 4:20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On 07/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> > >> build_sit_info() allocate all bitmaps for each segment one by one,
> > >> it's quite low efficiency, this pach changes to allocate large
> > >> continuous memory
As Eric reported:
On xfstest generic/204 on f2fs, I'm getting a kernel BUG.
allocate_segment_by_default+0x9d/0x100 [f2fs]
f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x3c0/0x5c0 [f2fs]
do_write_page+0x62/0x110 [f2fs]
f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x2b/0xa0 [f2fs]
__write_node_page+0x2ec/0x590 [f2fs]
On 2019/8/22 16:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I've figured out one patch for this issue, could you have a try?
Could you only check 204? I just hit deadlock in 051, not sure it is caused by
this patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2019/8/19 0:03, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:42, boojin.kim wrote:
>
> Diskcipher supports cryptographic operations of inline crypto engines like
> FMP. Inline crypto engine refers to hardware and solutions implemented
> to encrypt data stored in storage device.
>
> When encrypting using the FMP, Additional control
Hi Eric,
I've figured out one patch for this issue, could you have a try?
Thanks,
On 2019/8/19 0:03, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:37:35PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Sorry for late reply...
>>
>> I only hit ENOSPC error:
>>
>> QA output created by 204
>> line 82:
As Eric reported:
On xfstest generic/204 on f2fs, I'm getting a kernel BUG.
allocate_segment_by_default+0x9d/0x100 [f2fs]
f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x3c0/0x5c0 [f2fs]
do_write_page+0x62/0x110 [f2fs]
f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x2b/0xa0 [f2fs]
__write_node_page+0x2ec/0x590 [f2fs]
16 matches
Mail list logo