The final solution can be migrating blocks to form a section-aligned file
internally. Meanwhile, let's ask users to do that when preparing the swap
file initially like:
1) create()
2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE)
3) fallocate()
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Fixes: 36e4d95891ed ("f2fs: check if
On 2021/5/12 9:28, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/12 5:43, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
The final solution can be migrating blocks to form a section-aligned file
internally. Meanwhile, let's ask users to do that when preparing the swap
file initially like:
1) create()
2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE)
3)
This patch export below sysfs entries for better ATGC tunability.
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_candidate_ratio
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_candidate_count
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_age_weight
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_age_threshold
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
v2:
- limit value range of candidate_ratio and candidate_ratio in
On 2021/5/12 5:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/11, changfeng...@vivo.com wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk:
If there're existing clusters beyond i_size, may cause data corruption, but
will this happen in normal? maybe some error can cause this, if i_size is
error the data beyond size still can't handle properly.
On 2021/5/12 5:43, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
The final solution can be migrating blocks to form a section-aligned file
internally. Meanwhile, let's ask users to do that when preparing the swap
file initially like:
1) create()
2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE)
3) fallocate()
Let me take a look how to
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/11, changfeng...@vivo.com wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk:
> >
> > If there're existing clusters beyond i_size, may cause data corruption, but
> > will this happen in normal? maybe some error can cause this, if i_size is
> > error the
> On Apr 29, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Nick Terrell wrote:
>
> From: Nick Terrell
>
> Please pull from
>
> g...@github.com:terrelln/linux.git tags/v11-zstd-1.4.10
>
> to get these changes. Alternatively the patchset is included.
Hi all,
Pinging this series. Is there anything I should do to
On 05/11, changfeng...@vivo.com wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk:
>
> If there're existing clusters beyond i_size, may cause data corruption, but
> will this happen in normal? maybe some error can cause this, if i_size is
> error the data beyond size still can't handle properly. Is there normal
> case can
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/5/11 14:41, Daejun Park wrote:
> > > On 2021/5/11 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > >
The final solution can be migrating blocks to form a section-aligned file
internally. Meanwhile, let's ask users to do that when preparing the swap
file initially like:
1) create()
2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE)
3) fallocate()
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Fixes: 36e4d95891ed ("f2fs: check if
Hi Jaegeuk:
If there're existing clusters beyond i_size, may cause data corruption, but
will this happen in normal? maybe some error can cause this, if i_size is
error the data beyond size still can't handle properly. Is there normal
case can casue existing clusters beyond i_size?
Thanks.
This patch export below sysfs entries for better ATGC tunability.
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_candidate_ratio
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_candidate_count
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_age_weight
/sys/fs/f2fs//atgc_age_threshold
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 28
Default age threshold value is missed to set, fix it.
Fixes: 093749e296e2 ("f2fs: support age threshold based garbage collection")
Reported-by: Sahitya Tummala
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index
Em Mon, 10 May 2021 15:22:02 -0400
"Theodore Ts'o" escreveu:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:49:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 13:55 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > This patch series is doing conversion only when using ASCII makes
> > > more sense than
Em Mon, 10 May 2021 14:49:44 +0100
David Woodhouse escreveu:
> On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 13:55 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > This patch series is doing conversion only when using ASCII makes
> > more sense than using UTF-8.
> >
> > See, a number of converted documents ended with weird
Em Mon, 10 May 2021 15:33:47 +0100
Edward Cree escreveu:
> On 10/05/2021 14:59, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Most of these
> > UTF-8 characters come from latex conversions and really aren't
> > necessary (and are being used incorrectly).
> I fully agree with fixing those.
> The cover-letter,
On 2021/5/11 14:41, Daejun Park wrote:
On 2021/5/11 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote:
In file
compress_inode to cache compressed blocks
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003-20210511 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
a0fed635fe1701470062495a6ffee1c608f3f1bc)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp
>On 2021/5/11 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote:
In file defragmentation
On 2021/5/11 13:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote:
In file defragmentation by ioctl, all data blocks in the
On 2021/5/11 13:07, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2021/5/10 22:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
001a
pc : f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x144/0x208
lr : f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x134/0x208
Call trace:
21 matches
Mail list logo
