On 2021/9/4 12:40, Daeho Jeong wrote:
As a per curseg field.
Maybe, we run into the same race condition issue you told before for
fragment_remained_chunk.
Could you clarify this more?
e.g.
F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK
fragment_chunk_size = 384
fragment_hole_size = 38
> As a per curseg field.
>
> > Maybe, we run into the same race condition issue you told before for
> > fragment_remained_chunk.
> > Could you clarify this more?
>
> e.g.
>
> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK
> fragment_chunk_size = 384
> fragment_hole_size = 384
>
> When creati
On 2021/9/4 4:33, Daeho Jeong wrote:
if (f2fs_need_seq_seg(sbi))
return 0;
static inline bool f2fs_need_seq_seg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
return F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK;
}
Do you need this in select_policy(), either?
IMO, f
On 2021/9/4 8:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
I remember this gave a regression before?
I have removed changes which bothers checkpoint disabling path, how
about testing this in dev-test branch for a while?
BTW, any plan to porting checkpoint disabling testcases from android
into xfstest suit?
Thanks,
Hi Linus,
Could you please consider this pull request?
Thanks,
The following changes since commit e73f0f0ee7541171d89f2e2491130c7771ba58d3:
Linux 5.14-rc1 (2021-07-11 15:07:40 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git
ta
I remember this gave a regression before?
On 09/01, Chao Yu wrote:
> Quoted from [1]
>
> "I do remember that I've added this code back then because otherwise
> orphan cleanup was losing updates to quota files. But you're right
> that now I don't see how that could be happening and it would be nic
> if (f2fs_need_seq_seg(sbi))
> return 0;
>
> static inline bool f2fs_need_seq_seg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> return F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK;
> }
>
Do you need this in select_policy(), either?
Like,
if (f2fs_need_rand_seg(
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:40:37AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> This series backports some patches that failed to apply to 5.4-stable
> due to the prototype of inode_operations::getattr having changed in
> v5.12, as well several other conflicts. Please apply to 5.4-stable.
>
> Eric Biggers (4):
>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ubifs: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ub
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
f2fs: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
f2f
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fscrypt: add fscrypt_symlink_getattr() for computing st_size
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
12 matches
Mail list logo
