> -Original Message-
> From: changfeng...@vivo.com On Behalf Of
> Chao Yu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 11:31 AM
> To: fengnan chang
> Cc: 常凤楠 ; Jaegeuk Kim ;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] f2fs: fix missing inplace count in
> ove
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:56 AM Daeho Jeong wrote:
>
> > Yes, I doubt the problem may also happen in f2fs_evict_inode() with below
> > callpath:
> >
> > - evict_inode
> > - dquot_initialize failed
> > - sb_start_intwrite
> > - f2fs_truncate
> >- dquot_initialize lock dqio_sem
> >
> > Ho
Could you post the patch again? I don't see this in my box.
On 10/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> Jaegeuk,
>
> Missed to apply this patch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2021/9/24 17:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > This code looks quite confused: part of function returns 1 on
> > > corruption, part returns
From: Daeho Jeong
Even though fsck fixed quota issues, fsck returns failure status and
makes the user code misunderstand like errors are still there.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong
---
fsck/fsck.c | 6 --
include/f2fs_fs.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --g
From: Daeho Jeong
When we check other corrupted bugs in fsck, we use bug_on. So, if major
bugs are already detected in fsck_verify(), fsck will false alarm that
there are other bugs, even if there are no other bugs. So, let's fix this.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong
---
fsck/fsck.c | 35 ++
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> You just need to send me a git URL for your tree/branch (not a cgit or
> gitweb URL, please), plus some idea of what the tree include and how it
> is sent to Linus (directly or via another tree). The branch should
> have a generic name (i.e. not including a version) as
