Re: [f2fs-dev] Weird EROFS data corruption

2023-12-05 Thread Gao Xiang
Hi Juhyung, On 2023/12/5 22:43, Juhyung Park wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:34 PM Gao Xiang wrote: ... I'm still analyzing this behavior as well as the root cause and I will also try to get a recent cloud server with FSRM myself to find more clues. Down the rabbit hole we go... Let

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4 v2] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time

2023-12-05 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
In order to limit # of open zones, let's finish or reset zones given # of valid blocks per section and its zone condition. Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- - remove unnecessary wp_block fs/f2fs/segment.c | 75 +++ 1 file chan

Re: [f2fs-dev] Weird EROFS data corruption

2023-12-05 Thread Juhyung Park
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:34 PM Gao Xiang wrote: > > > > On 2023/12/5 22:23, Juhyung Park wrote: > > Hi Gao, > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Juhyung, > >> > >> On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote: > >> > >> ... > >>> > > - Could you share the

Re: [f2fs-dev] Weird EROFS data corruption

2023-12-05 Thread Gao Xiang
On 2023/12/5 22:23, Juhyung Park wrote: Hi Gao, On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang wrote: Hi Juhyung, On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote: ... - Could you share the full message about the output of `lscpu`? Sure: Architecture:x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):3

Re: [f2fs-dev] Weird EROFS data corruption

2023-12-05 Thread Juhyung Park
Hi Gao, On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang wrote: > > Hi Juhyung, > > On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote: > > ... > > > >> > >> - Could you share the full message about the output of `lscpu`? > > > > Sure: > > > > Architecture:x86_64 > >CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-