On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:32:05PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:54:47PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:47:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 07,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:54:47PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:47:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > Me and Pankaj are
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:54:47PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:47:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Me and Pankaj are very interested in helping on this front. And so we'll
> > > start to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:47:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:18:41PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > From a filesystem point of view, you need to ensure that you handle folios
> > > larger than
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:18:41PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > From a filesystem point of view, you need to ensure that you handle folios
> > larger than PAGE_SIZE correctly. The easiest way is to spread the use
> > of
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:18:41PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:48:04PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Thanks for reviewing this. I think the real solution to this is
> > > that f2fs should be using large folios. That way, the page cache
> > > will keep
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:48:04PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for reviewing this. I think the real solution to this is
> > that f2fs should be using large folios. That way, the page cache
> > will keep track of dirtiness on a per-folio basis, and if your folios
> > are at least
Hi,
> Thanks for reviewing this. I think the real solution to this is
> that f2fs should be using large folios. That way, the page cache
> will keep track of dirtiness on a per-folio basis, and if your folios
> are at least as large as your cluster size, you won't need to do the
>
Hi qixiaoyu1,
Thanks for your patchset.
Does this patchset have data related to memory and performance impact?
Can you provide scripts or commands for related tests?
Thx,
Yangtao
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
