Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: flag as supporting buffered async reads

2023-06-07 Thread patchwork-bot+f2fs
Hello: This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim : On Wed, 31 May 2023 20:59:18 +0800 you wrote: > After enabling this feature, the read performance has been greatly > improved: > > 167M/s -> 234M/s, Increase ratio by 40% > > Test w/: > ./fio --name=onessd --filena

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: flag as supporting buffered async reads

2023-06-05 Thread Chao Yu
On 2023/6/6 3:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: On 05/31, Juhyung Park wrote: Hi Yangtao, I remember hearing that f2fs can perform relatively poorly under io_uring, nice find. I suggest rewriting the commit message though. From the looks of it, it might suggest that FMODE_BUF_RASYNC is a magic flag that

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: flag as supporting buffered async reads

2023-06-05 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 05/31, Juhyung Park wrote: > Hi Yangtao, > > I remember hearing that f2fs can perform relatively poorly under io_uring, > nice find. > > I suggest rewriting the commit message though. From the looks of it, it > might suggest that FMODE_BUF_RASYNC is a magic flag that automatically > improves p

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: flag as supporting buffered async reads

2023-05-31 Thread Juhyung Park
Hi Yangtao, I remember hearing that f2fs can perform relatively poorly under io_uring, nice find. I suggest rewriting the commit message though. From the looks of it, it might suggest that FMODE_BUF_RASYNC is a magic flag that automatically improves performance that can be enabled willy nilly. H

[f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: flag as supporting buffered async reads

2023-05-31 Thread Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel
After enabling this feature, the read performance has been greatly improved: 167M/s -> 234M/s, Increase ratio by 40% Test w/: ./fio --name=onessd --filename=/data/test/local/io_uring_test --size=256M --rw=randread --bs=4k --direct=0 --overwrite=0 --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --time_bas