On 04/14/2014 09:44 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Gu,
>
> I just started to review the patches and merge them individually though.
> Since I've been internally doing in my local tree, so that should be no
> problem. I'll roll back to the latest point.
OK, and please pay some attention to the flush
Hi Gu,
I just started to review the patches and merge them individually though.
Since I've been internally doing in my local tree, so that should be no
problem. I'll roll back to the latest point.
Anyway, thank you for your work. :)
2014-04-14 (월), 09:18 +0800, Gu Zheng:
> Hi All,
> There seems t
Hi All,
There seems to be a mistake in "[PATCH 2/7]f2fs: remove the unuseful
"issue_tail" list",
and the whole patchset needs to be reworked. So please ignore this one.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Gu
On 04/11/2014 05:49 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Gu Zheng (7):
> f2fs: put the bio when issue_flush
Gu Zheng (7):
f2fs: put the bio when issue_flush completed
f2fs: remove the unuseful "issue_tail" list
f2fs: use __GFP_ZERO to avoid appending set-NULL
f2fs: enable flush_merge only in f2fs is not read-only
f2fs: add the flush_merge handle in the remount flow
f2fs: introduce struct flus
