Both callers of fuse_perform_write need to updated ki_pos, move it into
common code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 9
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:11:13AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Why remove generic_write_sync()? Definitely doesn't belong in this
> patch even if there's a good reason.
Yes, this shouldn't have happened. I think this was a bad merge
resolution after the current->backing_dev removal.
___
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 09:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Both callers of fuse_perform_write need to updated ki_pos, move it into
> common code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 23 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertio
Both callers of fuse_perform_write need to updated ki_pos, move it into
common code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 23 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
inde
