On 2023/8/8 3:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 08/07, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/8/5 4:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/22 4:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 08/07, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/8/5 4:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/22 4:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Ki
On 2023/8/5 4:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/22 4:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/22 4:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Ki
On 2023/7/22 4:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Ki
Comments?
On 2023/7/13 9:31, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu
On 2023/7/12 23:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim
On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoi
On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint
On 2023/7/6 8:46, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
insanely. Let's issu
On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
Si
On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint
> > > > latency
> > > > insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
> > > >
On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
Change log from v1:
- move
On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
> > insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
> >
> > Change log from v1:
> >- move the skip
On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
Change log from v1:
- move the skip logic to avoid dangling objects
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2
If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency
insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
Change log from v1:
- move the skip logic to avoid dangling objects
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 delet
18 matches
Mail list logo