Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: fix to avoid broken of dnode block list

2018-07-27 Thread Chao Yu
On 2018/7/27 18:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote: >> f2fs recovery flow is relying on dnode block link list, it means fsynced >> file recovery depends on previous dnode's persistence in the list, so >> during fsync() we should wait on all regular inode's dnode writebacked >> before

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: fix to avoid broken of dnode block list

2018-07-27 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote: > f2fs recovery flow is relying on dnode block link list, it means fsynced > file recovery depends on previous dnode's persistence in the list, so > during fsync() we should wait on all regular inode's dnode writebacked > before issuing flush. > > By this way, we can avoid

[f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: fix to avoid broken of dnode block list

2018-07-25 Thread Chao Yu
f2fs recovery flow is relying on dnode block link list, it means fsynced file recovery depends on previous dnode's persistence in the list, so during fsync() we should wait on all regular inode's dnode writebacked before issuing flush. By this way, we can avoid dnode block list being broken by out