fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] Space leak in f2fs
> >
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:31:43PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > >
> >
l.org;
>linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] Space leak in f2fs
>>
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:31:43PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> > Hi Jaegeuk,
>> >
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 8:56 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: 'hujianyang'; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev]
Hi Chao,
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:31:43PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
[snip]
> > + /* if orphan inode, we don't need to write its data */
> > + if (is_orphan_inode(sbi, inode->i_ino))
> > + goto out;
>
> When user create a temp file by invoking open with O_TMPFILE fla
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 5:14 AM
> To: hujianyang
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] Space leak in f2fs
>
&g
Hi Hu,
I've been rethinking about whole this issue differently.
And, now I'm starting to test with the below patch instead of previous one.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 19 +++
fs/f2fs/data.c | 4
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
fs/f2fs
I'll push the patch into dev branch right now.
Let me know, if there is any problem.
Thanks,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:40:25AM +0800, hujianyang wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> I've tested this patch. It's OK now. Seems this problem is fixed.
>
> I'd like to push this patch to my local tree and run a
Hi Jaegeuk,
I've tested this patch. It's OK now. Seems this problem is fixed.
I'd like to push this patch to my local tree and run a formal
stress test next week. Will you push this patch to f2fs-dev branch?
If you have other modification to this fix, please let me know.
Thanks very much!
Hu
O
Hi Hu,
Found a bug in the previous patch.
Could you check this out?
Thanks,
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 19438f2..647591b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -431,8 +
Hi Hu,
Thank you for the report.
When I tried to reproduce this, it seems that this can occur under somewhat
stressful condition. I could't reach out to this problem.
Nevertheless, I think this is a possible scenario, so I wrote a patch for this.
Could you test this patch?
Thanks,
---
fs/f2fs
Hi Jaegeuk,
I found a space leak problem in f2fs. This problem could lead to
ENOSPC error during stress tests, e.g. ltp.
<<>>
growfiles(gf15): 11656 growfiles.c/2249: 16920 tlibio.c/739 write(6, buf, 1352)
ret:-1, errno=28 No space left on device
gf151 TFAIL : growfiles.c:132: Test fa
11 matches
Mail list logo
