Hi Juhyung,
On 2023/12/5 22:43, Juhyung Park wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:34 PM Gao Xiang wrote:
...
I'm still analyzing this behavior as well as the root cause and
I will also try to get a recent cloud server with FSRM myself
to find more clues.
Down the rabbit hole we go...
Let
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:34 PM Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/12/5 22:23, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > Hi Gao,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Juhyung,
> >>
> >> On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>>
>
> - Could you share
On 2023/12/5 22:23, Juhyung Park wrote:
Hi Gao,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Juhyung,
On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote:
...
- Could you share the full message about the output of `lscpu`?
Sure:
Architecture:x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):
Hi Gao,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> Hi Juhyung,
>
> On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> >>
> >> - Could you share the full message about the output of `lscpu`?
> >
> > Sure:
> >
> > Architecture:x86_64
> >CPU op-mode(s):32-bit,
Hi Juhyung,
On 2023/12/4 11:41, Juhyung Park wrote:
...
- Could you share the full message about the output of `lscpu`?
Sure:
Architecture:x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order:
Hi Gao,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:28 PM Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/12/4 01:32, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > Hi Gao,
>
> ...
>
> >>>
>
> What is the difference between these two machines? just different CPU or
> they have some other difference like different compliers?
> >>>
> >>>
On 2023/12/4 01:32, Juhyung Park wrote:
Hi Gao,
...
What is the difference between these two machines? just different CPU or
they have some other difference like different compliers?
I fully and exclusively control both devices, and the setup is almost the same.
Same Ubuntu version,
Hi Gao,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:22 AM Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/12/4 01:01, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > Hi Gao,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:52 AM Gao Xiang
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Juhyung,
> >>
> >> On 2023/12/4 00:22, Juhyung Park wrote:
> >>> (Cc'ing f2fs and crypto as I've noticed
On 2023/12/4 01:01, Juhyung Park wrote:
Hi Gao,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:52 AM Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Juhyung,
On 2023/12/4 00:22, Juhyung Park wrote:
(Cc'ing f2fs and crypto as I've noticed something similar with f2fs a
while ago, which may mean that this is not specific to EROFS:
Hi Juhyung,
On 2023/12/4 00:22, Juhyung Park wrote:
(Cc'ing f2fs and crypto as I've noticed something similar with f2fs a
while ago, which may mean that this is not specific to EROFS:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cad14+f2nbztlflc6cwnjgcourrrjwzttp3d3ik4of+1eejk...@mail.gmail.com/
)
Hi.
I'm
Hi Gao,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:52 AM Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> Hi Juhyung,
>
> On 2023/12/4 00:22, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > (Cc'ing f2fs and crypto as I've noticed something similar with f2fs a
> > while ago, which may mean that this is not specific to EROFS:
> >
(Cc'ing f2fs and crypto as I've noticed something similar with f2fs a
while ago, which may mean that this is not specific to EROFS:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cad14+f2nbztlflc6cwnjgcourrrjwzttp3d3ik4of+1eejk...@mail.gmail.com/
)
Hi.
I'm encountering a very weird EROFS data corruption.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
