Hi,
On 05/26/17 06:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/25, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
Hi
First of all, I'm really really sorry for my absence and replying too late.
On 05/17/17 22:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi,
Honestly speaking, I didn't expect to encountered such a confusi
On 05/25, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> First of all, I'm really really sorry for my absence and replying too late.
>
> On 05/17/17 22:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/17, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since I want to make sure that my system, having a database app, stay
> >
Hi
First of all, I'm really really sorry for my absence and replying too late.
On 05/17/17 22:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/17, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since I want to make sure that my system, having a database app, stay
>> operational after the power failure, I test database syste
On 05/17, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> On 05/12/17 04:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 05/10, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > As you told to use snapshot mechanism to prevent changing ckpt number
> > > after
> > > each mount, I ran again generic tests of xfstests framework on top o
On 05/12/17 04:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/10, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> ...
>
>> As you told to use snapshot mechanism to prevent changing ckpt number after
>> each mount, I ran again generic tests of xfstests framework on top of
>> log-writes target with f2fs file system. In order to au
Hi,
On 05/12, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/12/17 04:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 05/10, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > As you told to use snapshot mechanism to prevent changing ckpt number
> > > after
> > > each mount, I ran again generic tests of xfstests fram
Hi,
On 05/12/17 04:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/10, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> ...
>
>> As you told to use snapshot mechanism to prevent changing ckpt number after
>> each mount, I ran again generic tests of xfstests framework on top of
>> log-writes target with f2fs file system. In order
Hi,
On 05/10, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
...
> As you told to use snapshot mechanism to prevent changing ckpt number after
> each mount, I ran again generic tests of xfstests framework on top of
> log-writes target with f2fs file system. In order to automate reporting an
> inconsistency situation, I
On 04/14/17 01:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/13, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The Flash friendly features of f2fs has motivated me to make use of
>> these characteristics as rootfs in my project. Since one of my main
>> considerations is the resilience in the face of power failu
On 04/15, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>
>
> On 04/15/17 04:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/14, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04/14/17 01:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> First of all, thank you so much for your help.
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I just ran log-writer with fsstress and found
On 04/15/17 04:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/14, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>>
>> On 04/14/17 01:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> First of all, thank you so much for your help.
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just ran log-writer with fsstress and found one issue when replaying IOs.
>>> If you replay after mk
On 04/14/17 23:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/14, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
>> First of all, thank you so much for your help.
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just ran log-writer with fsstress and found one issue when replaying IOs.
>>> If you replay after mkfs.f2fs, you get the wrong valid checkpoint which was
Hello,
On 04/13, Raouf Rokhjavan wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Flash friendly features of f2fs has motivated me to make use of
> these characteristics as rootfs in my project. Since one of my main
> considerations is the resilience in the face of power failure, I've been
> looking for some techniques to
Hi
The Flash friendly features of f2fs has motivated me to make use of
these characteristics as rootfs in my project. Since one of my main
considerations is the resilience in the face of power failure, I've been
looking for some techniques to prove this assertion. Finally, I ended up
finding a
14 matches
Mail list logo
