On Wednesday 26 July 2006 16:06, Ingo Wichmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The bootloader is actually configured in task_configure, isn't it? Thats
> not too nice for softupdates and non-debian distros. Shouldn't there be
> a task_bootloader?
>
> Any opinions? Should i file a bugreport?
Hmmm...I configure an
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:06:45 +0200, Ingo Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> The bootloader is actually configured in task_configure, isn't it? Thats
Yep, bootloaders are configured there.
> not too nice for softupdates and non-debian distros. Shouldn't there be
> a ta
Hi,
On Thursday 27 July 2006 11:00, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Why? I think even for softupdates, you sometimes like to reconfigure
> your bootloader. It's only important that the bootloader configure
> code is idempotent :-)
But there should also be an option NOT to install/configure the bootloader..
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:34:53AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 11:00, Thomas Lange wrote:
> > Why? I think even for softupdates, you sometimes like to reconfigure
> > your bootloader. It's only important that the bootloader configure
> > code is idempotent :-)
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:34:53 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> But there should also be an option NOT to install/configure the
bootloader...
> some systems dont have a bootloader (think vserver etc), others have it
vserver has no kernel on its own, so it's ea
