On Thursday 21 September 2006 15:20, Thomas Lange wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:04:40 +0200, "Henning Sprang" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> LOGSERVER has been moved to CS.
>
> > What does CS mean?
> Config space, so it's your /srv/fai/config tree.
>
> > Not sure,
On 9/21/06, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:20:02 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Saving logs via ssh(scp) doesn`t work in beta.
Please send a detailed bug report to the BTS (bugs.debian.org).
If we want feedback, we shouldn't force peop
> Hi,
>
> is anybody using sendmail on FAI clients? Especially how do you deal with
> sendmailconfig confirmations.
>
Is sendmail using debconf or what kind of confirmations are these? I think I've
never used sendmail on Debian ...
Thanks,
Michael
pgpJWC5FoZOyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:20:02 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Saving logs via ssh(scp) doesn`t work in beta.
Please send a detailed bug report to the BTS (bugs.debian.org). I will
not work on such a short bug report. If you need quick help for minor
problems, come to #fai
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:21:24 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> is anybody using sendmail on FAI clients? Especially how do you deal with
> sendmailconfig confirmations.
Yep, I'm using FAI and sendmail on sarge systems withou any hassle.
./files/etc/mail
./files/etc/ma
Hi,
is anybody using sendmail on FAI clients? Especially how do you deal with
sendmailconfig confirmations.
cheers,
juraj
Hello,
Saving logs via ssh(scp) doesn`t work in beta.
I copied the savelog.LAST.source from the examples. It doesn`t print any
error, but the logs aren`t transfered to to server.
thanks,
juraj
On Thursday 21 September 2006 15:18, Henning Sprang wrote:
> I told you, you can copy the missing files with a pre installation hook.
thanx, that did it.
juraj
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:45:05 +0200, "Henning Sprang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> On 9/21/06, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --- subroutines-linux (revision 3953)
>> +++ subroutines-linux (working copy)
> Should we do it like that/at this place? Shouldn
On 9/21/06, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- subroutines-linux (revision 3953)
+++ subroutines-linux (working copy)
Should we do it like that/at this place? Shouldn't we just provide a
hook in the simple examples?
(which means, using FAI flexible architecture instead of hardcodin
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:03:36 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ls /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
> 10fai 70debconf 90fai
> so the 10fai and 90fai is MISSING.
I hope you will test this patch and send me feedback.
Index: subroutines-linux
===
On Thursday 21 September 2006 15:18, you wrote:
> Please stick with 2.X if you need stable
> software.
Not easy done if you want to install ETCH since beta got into testing and
really not future-prone as next update is planned when etch becomes stable.
> But don't forget that we need beta tester
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:04:40 +0200, "Henning Sprang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> LOGSERVER has been moved to CS.
> What does CS mean?
Config space, so it's your /srv/fai/config tree.
> Not sure, try if it works to define that variable in the config file
> /etc/fai/f
CS used in config space (often defined by *.var)
as
http://faiwiki.informatik.uni-koeln.de/index.php/Variables
says (at the top)
juraj
On Thursday 21 September 2006 15:04, you wrote:
> On 9/21/06, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > my fai.conf has FAI_LOGPROTO=ssh as the comment above sa
Juraj, please don't do fullquotes at the bottom of mails, that's not
good to read, only quote the parts necessary, and add your comments
below, or in between.
On 9/21/06, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
ls /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
10fai 70debconf 90fai
so the 10fai and 90fai is MISS
Well,
what I did was using FAI 2.10.5 just 2 days ago to install ETCH -> no
problems, no additional fix or hook,the fix is alredy in apt.conf.d
then I moved to beta, as it got into testing(etch) (too soon in my opinion)
and from this point on, I`m experiencing problems
now if I look at /tmp/ta
On 9/21/06, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my fai.conf has FAI_LOGPROTO=ssh as the comment above says. But waht I
actually need is scp. Is ssh automagically replaced with scp?
LOGSERVER has been moved to CS.
What does CS mean?
The wiki says the the default value ist
$SERVER, but the
my fai.conf has FAI_LOGPROTO=ssh as the comment above says. But waht I
actually need is scp. Is ssh automagically replaced with scp?
LOGSERVER has been moved to CS. The wiki says the the default value ist
$SERVER, but the variable is empty!
That means that I have to put LOGSERVER=xyz into some .
On 9/21/06, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:26:08 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> as you can see from my previous email (fai-client), I have the same
problem
> with unsigned repositories even with your repositories for the developer
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:02:01 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> have these been completly removed or just renamed?
In FAI 3 variables have been renamed. Have a look at
http://faiwiki.informatik.uni-koeln.de/index.php/Variables
and
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/fai/trunk/debi
have these been completly removed or just renamed?
I`m using them in my hook to gather the macaddr for wake-on-lan purposes, when
I want to fire up automatic reinstall on all clients (desktops, they are
turned of at night).
#! /bin/bash
wolfile="fai-wol.cfg"
echo "Update FAI-WOL via $FAI_REMOTE
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:26:08 +0200, Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> as you can see from my previous email (fai-client), I have the same
problem
> with unsigned repositories even with your repositories for the developer
pool
> any idea what it could be?
No. ATM I do n
22 matches
Mail list logo
